My two large cups of morning coffee must have been extra strong today, because I arrived at work today inspired. Then when I sat down to write, all those great ideas I came up with just a few hours ago, scattered like Mexicans on an INS raid. I do remember one thing, in my extensive history of 3 posts I haven't presented one idea of my own. I have been criticizing all the decisions and actions of the Demosionalist (Democrat + Socialist + Emotion = Demosionalist), and not providing an idea of my own. This realization sucked because its my biggest pet peeve with the Demosionlists.
With the new year comes a Demosionalist controlled Congress and Senate. They have already stated what they are going to do, I think. They have flip flopped more than Paris Hilton with her boyfriend in that sex video. Its just a figure of speech I mean I didn't actually watch the...whatever. What I mean is the Demosionlist didn't win elections standing for what they believe in and when asked what they were going to do about taxes, Iraq, Iran, National Security, or the border they didn't say anything. Until they were elected, see post "Herding Cats". Which brings up the question why did they get elected? Well I hate to join the band wagon and God Bless him, but I have to say it. "Its Bush's Fault".
ON A SIDE NOTE: I would say it was the Iraq War also, but that is an entirely different rant of the usual bitching and complaining about lack of support in the media, and collaring the troops. I mean what red blooded American feels comfortable with airing footage of an American Soldier being shot by a sniper. Why isn't Ted Turner and the Caliphate News Network (CNN) being investigated? Where the hell did they get the tape? Does anyone at CNN have any God Damn sense. That footage didn't make me want to get out of Iraq, it made me want to take the leash off our soldiers so they can kill every sand monkey, camel stroking, mullah loving, imam, jihadist in Iraq. I don't think that is the type of emotion CNN was counting on generating with that footage, which is the initial reaction of anyone that loves this Country. OK, the vein in my forehead has receded.
Back to "Its Bush's Fault". He was not conservative enough, he took on the fight way to late in the election, and he did not lead the conservative movement. So, a House and Senate has been elected that is going to find a way to raise taxes, promote class warfare, deteriorate National Security, continue to vilify the President, the military, and Conservative ideals, all while making it look like "Bush's Fault". Hell they even used the death of a Republican (Liberal Republican) President to beat bush. Have you ever seen a group of people exploit death as much as liberals? Really, watch liberals when someone dies or is about to die. i.e. Mrs. Loretta Scott King, President Nixon, President Ford, Terry Schiavo, Bob Hope, etc. Me, me, me. Someone dies and all they can talk about is themselves. Its a freeckin funeral...you self righteous "holier than tho" self centered pricks. But I digress.
How should the President respond to this new congress? Well here is my advice Mr. President, take it for what its worth.
Its time to take the fight to the Demosionlists. You need to be the cowboy, hard ass, missunderestimated, tell it like it is, president I voted for 6 years ago. Make them be liberal, make them talk, because the more liberals talk the more they screw up. For example, John Kerry, and Howard Dean. Every time these two distinguished and educated gentlemen don't read from the cue card they say things so ridiculous that comedians have difficulty making jokes about them. So, Mr. President pressure them to say something ridiculous, and when they start back peddling trip them up, and when they fall kick them in the balls. This includes Nancy Pelosi and Mrs. William Clinton, they both have bigger balls than any liberal, Male or Female.
National Security
This Administration has a stellar record on National Security. There have been multiple plots stopped cold, and no attacks on the homeland since 9/11. This was accomplished in spite of traitorous actions of the NY Times and other media outlets continually publicizing top secret information. "All the news that's fit to Print". I would line my bird cage with the NY Times, but its not even fit for bird shit.
Mr. President, stand on your record, and attack these people including the members of congress that are against the Patriot Act, Terrorist Surveillance, and "aggressive" interrogation. Find the leaks and prosecute. Every time there is a positive development that is cleared for the public get on the soap box and scream about it. Show the American people what is really going on.
Take Fiscal Responsibility
The Demosionalist have already said that they are going to raise taxes, without really saying it. They are going to repeal the "Bush Tax Cuts", which is raising taxes. There will be the classic class warfare strategy taxing the rich and give to the poor. Being rich and successful is evil, and its the Rich peoples fault there are poor people.
Side Note: Demosionalist definition of rich is $60,000.00 annual income no matter where you live. Is that before or after your tax increase Chuckie Rangel.
Attack these people. The tax cuts that have been implemented have obviously helped the economy. The market is at an all time high, unemployment is almost non-existent, according to the IRS only 85,000 Americans over the age of 25 worked for minimum wage in 2005, inflation is good, interest rates are low, and tax revenue is steadily increasing. The month of October the IRS reported the highest tax revenue in the history of the United States, that's weighted for inflation. All these things were created in the last 6 years. Use this as a weapon to oppose any tax increase and class warfare strategy that the Demosionalists will try to create. Make them say why they want to increase taxes, and increase spending.
I realize asking any politician to stop spending is like asking an alcoholic to stop drinking. Its going to take a long time, lots of meetings, and a minimum of a "12 step" program. Speaking of spending, could you trim the excess spending. Stop giving in to the Demosionalists every time they have some jerk-off bill. I call them jerk-off bills because they are created and voted on in minutes, make a big mess, feel real good at the moment, and then guilt i.e. No-Child-Left-Behind, or Prescription Drug, both perceived failures, both constructed and directed by Liberals in bi-partisanship, and you Mr. Bush catch the heat if they fail and recieve no credit if the succeed.
Illegal Border Crossing
Change your view on illegal border crossing. SECURE THE BORDERS. More fence, more men, more Swift like raids, and no amnesty i.e. Guest Worker Program. I even think you should use a catch phrase, for example, "NO WAY JOSE" "PACO MUST GO".
Put pressure on Mexico and its corrupt, socialist, unproductive Government. Mexico is the problem. Seriously, if cutting a two acre lawn with 6" trimming shears at $2.50/hr, and living in a 2 bedroom 1 bathroom apartment with 20 other illegal immigrants is better than what they can get in Mexico, I have to ask, where is the real problem?
IRAN
I have a hard time taking this guy Mohmud "I am a damn jihadi" seriously. I mean c'mon. Do we actually have to listen to this guy. He is bragging about 1 atomic bomb. ONE. I agree that one in the hands of this guy is trouble, but we have thousands. I can here it now. "We must negotiate with him, we have to take the moral high ground, think of all the innocent lives that could be lost". No, he needs to think about that. We have to think about Americans. Mr. President dare him to develop WMD's. Double dog dare him, hell Triple Dog Dare him. Either stop building WMD's or we will destroy the WMD's. Continue to obtain or construct WMD's and we will destroy you, not your country, you Mr. "Ima taken it in the ass hard". Other countries supplying you with WMD's or the technology associated with them, (Hello Vladimir Putin, and Kim "I suck" Jong Il) your days are numbered. Also Mr. "Wann-be-Hitler" continue to support the "insurgency" and we will blow up ANYTHING that crosses the Iraqi border. I am sure the Kurds will be more than willing to take up this responsibility.
Also, Mr. President follow the strategy of Obe Ron Regan and support the factions in Iran that want "I am a damn jihadi" out of there. Yes, there are a lot of Iranians that do not like the mullahs or the Iranian President. Just ask Iranians like Amil Imani. Also, expand our military capabilities, and make "Star Wars" (Strategic Missile Defense) a reality. Those two things will almost eliminate the threat of a nuclear strike. Speak softly and carry a big stick, and may the force be with you.
War In Iraq
Attack, Attack, Attack. The United States Military is the greatest military the World has ever known. Use it. There are rumors that troop levels are going to be increased. The so called troop "surge". That's fine, if you let them do their job, which is kill the sand monkey jihadists. I realize the media will vilify you, the troops, the military and anyone else that is involved. They will be screaming Haditha every time the military makes a move. I don't care. Make the civilian casualties look like its the terrorists fault.
The point of war is to disarm the enemy. In this case the enemies strongest weapon is the will to fight. Their will to do what is needed to win is much greater than ours. Break the will of the people, break the will of the terrorists. Sound a little harsh? If we had unrestricted warfare and the American media was, God Forbid, on the side of America there would be less civilian casualties, less military casualties, and there would be less terrorists. The media is a hopeless cause, but you have the power to scare the shit out of every sand monkey jihadist on the planet. Its kill or be killed. Mahmoud "Ima suckin penis hard" and men like him have drawn the line, not you.
Mr. President if you do all this and the things needed to make these ideas successful I believe that Iraq will continue to be free and successful, Iran will be castrated, the market will continue to grow, and the liberals will continue to have diarrhea of the mouth; revealing who they really are. But, I have to be honest Mr. President. I am not confident you will go in this direction. Its the 15 th round and I don't know if you are Apollo Creed or Rocky Balboa. I am praying that you are Rocky Balboa, because if your Apollo Creed, Hillary Clinton will be President in 09 and I will have to move to Australia.
This will be my last post for the this year. Merry Freekin Winter and Happy Calender Change.
Friday, December 29, 2006
Wednesday, December 13, 2006
Herding Cats
Has anyone every tried to herd cats? I ask this because I think that is what controlling the democrats in congress is going to be like.
In November I was scared to death. Damn it, the democrats have control over both houses. I am moving to Australia.
Then Pelosi said "I want John Murtha for House Majority Leader". That was shot down like a UN resolution. So much for getting rid of the "Culture of Corruption". Can you say Abscam?...Yes,...I thought that you could.
Then her good friend Charlie Rangel said that he can not think of one of Bush's tax cuts that could "merit renewal". Hey Charlie, I don't think Mrs. Pelosi approved that message. I am pretty sure she wanted to keep that idea on the "DL dog". Way to shed that tax and spend stereotype. Especially since you made that statement after the US Treasury reported the highest tax revenue in the history of the United States, with inflation.
Than Pelosi said "I want Alcee Hastings, one of only 7 federal judges in two hundred plus years to ever get removed from the bench, for Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee". This also went over well, considering she stated "I will bring civility back to congress". Pelosi voted for his impeachment, but nominated him for one of the most powerful positions in Congress. She also passed over the ranking democrat on the committee, a fellow woman with a clean record, and one of the few honorable democrats Jane Harmon. By the way Jane Harmon is a Bush critic, but supports the war. Coincidence, I think not. She saw trouble a brewing with Alcee Hastings, and nominated Silvestre Reyes. Which backfired. He failed a quiz on Hezbollah and Al Qaeda given to him by CQ National Security editor Jeff Stein. Good choice Nancy. Any other minorities you would like to exploit?
Is there anyone in congress listening to Nancy? What happen to that "They will do what I say, and toe the party line" type affect she was supposed to have? According to Barbara Walters she is the most fascinating person of 2006. I would have to agree, here is a woman that spent years to get to the Speaker of the House, she finally gets there and screws it up before she can even take the Oath of Office. Maybe she hasn't used her "Mother of Five" voice.
So, I have decided that I am not going to move to Australia just yet. This is the perfect time to sit back and watch Mrs. Pelosi try and regain control over a congress that has not even convened yet. Which has become more difficult because of her recent nominations. So, Mrs. Pelosi have fun herding those cats, and don't forget your "mother of five" voice.
In November I was scared to death. Damn it, the democrats have control over both houses. I am moving to Australia.
Then Pelosi said "I want John Murtha for House Majority Leader". That was shot down like a UN resolution. So much for getting rid of the "Culture of Corruption". Can you say Abscam?...Yes,...I thought that you could.
Then her good friend Charlie Rangel said that he can not think of one of Bush's tax cuts that could "merit renewal". Hey Charlie, I don't think Mrs. Pelosi approved that message. I am pretty sure she wanted to keep that idea on the "DL dog". Way to shed that tax and spend stereotype. Especially since you made that statement after the US Treasury reported the highest tax revenue in the history of the United States, with inflation.
Than Pelosi said "I want Alcee Hastings, one of only 7 federal judges in two hundred plus years to ever get removed from the bench, for Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee". This also went over well, considering she stated "I will bring civility back to congress". Pelosi voted for his impeachment, but nominated him for one of the most powerful positions in Congress. She also passed over the ranking democrat on the committee, a fellow woman with a clean record, and one of the few honorable democrats Jane Harmon. By the way Jane Harmon is a Bush critic, but supports the war. Coincidence, I think not. She saw trouble a brewing with Alcee Hastings, and nominated Silvestre Reyes. Which backfired. He failed a quiz on Hezbollah and Al Qaeda given to him by CQ National Security editor Jeff Stein. Good choice Nancy. Any other minorities you would like to exploit?
Is there anyone in congress listening to Nancy? What happen to that "They will do what I say, and toe the party line" type affect she was supposed to have? According to Barbara Walters she is the most fascinating person of 2006. I would have to agree, here is a woman that spent years to get to the Speaker of the House, she finally gets there and screws it up before she can even take the Oath of Office. Maybe she hasn't used her "Mother of Five" voice.
So, I have decided that I am not going to move to Australia just yet. This is the perfect time to sit back and watch Mrs. Pelosi try and regain control over a congress that has not even convened yet. Which has become more difficult because of her recent nominations. So, Mrs. Pelosi have fun herding those cats, and don't forget your "mother of five" voice.
Tuesday, December 12, 2006
ISG Report - Everyday perspective
First let me apologize for not posting something on this earlier. I realize that the report was released last week, but I wanted to read it completely before I completed my opinion on this report. Also, be warned the word stupid is relative to the accumulated experience of the ISG and what is expected by such a well educated; distinguished group.
I would like to start with the Iraq Study Group members. These individuals represent the best in American education and experience in political and social sciences. Every single one of them have very impressive resumes. They each have spent their entire careers in some sort of highly regarded council or committee. They are the best of the best of American Bureaucracy. Two questions though Sandra Day O'Connor and Vernon Jordan.....Hey look at that I am bipartisan.
What the hell do they have to do with anything in Iraq.
Vernon Jordan - Stain Master General himself. Apparently covering up presidential perjury, sex scandals, and shady real estate deals constitutes foreign policy experience. Despite his apparently stellar resume stated in the ISG report, there had to be more credible candidate than this guy.
Sandra Day O'Connor - I guess she was selected for her experience with constitutional law. I am assuming she knows how to build a Constitution considering she has spent most of her tenor as Supreme Court Justice deconstructing ours.
With this groups obvious experience and education the ISG report should be a grand document full of ideas that are "outside of the box", and according to the media this group will have the answers to all our problems with the war on terror. When the report was finally released the individual members obviously felt like they were really really really really really really important. The arrogance and condescension with which the members of the ISG carried themselves was almost as aggravating as listening to idle threats from 5' tall dictators of third world nations. If these guys and gal were so smart, educated, and experienced then why is the ISG report so incredibly stupid. I am not only talking about the entire concept in general, but individual statements are just laced with stupidity.
Just an analysis of a few "Recommendations" to prove my point.
Recommendation 3: The Iraq International Support Group
A conglomeration of Iraq's neighbors with a vested interest in a stable Iraq.
Actual statement in the ISG "It is clear to Iraq Study Group members that all of Iraq's neighbors are anxious about the situation in Iraq. (ya think?) They favor a unified Iraq that is strong enough to maintain its territorial integrity, but not so powerful as to threaten its neighbors. None favors a break up of the Iraqi state."
Uhhh what? Isn't there a consensus that Iran and Syria are the major contributors to the chaos, thus supporting a more chaotic Iraq? Just a question. The report continues to reinforce the idea that Iran and Syria want a stable Iraq with multiple examples of Iran and Syria promoting the violence in Iraq. This includes statements saying that Iran is training, supplying, and funding shia groups. Sure does sound like an interest in a stable Iraq.
Recommendation 4: Iraq Support Group - More of the same. Appease the terrorists. Negotiate with Iran Syria and Palestine.
"Accordingly, the Support Group should actively engage Iran and Syria in its diplomatic dialogue, without preconditions" - There is some wisdom. So, the United States can offer ultimatums to the Iraqis, but not our enemies.
Recommendation 9: "...United States should engage directly with Iran and Syria in order to try to obtain their commitment to constructive policies toward Iraq and other regional issues." Then they go on to quote a "senior military official" in Iraq as saying "Iran does its negotiating with the United States on the streets of Baghdad". There is less contradiction in the Koran.
Recommendation 10: "The issue of Iran's nuclear programs should continue to be dealt with by the United Nations Security Council and its five permanent members (i.e. United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia, and China) plus Germany." The UN? Come on they can't be serious. I mean the UN and the security council, have a stellar record in the Middle East. Ask any Jew living in Israel. I feel that China and Russia want us to focus on Iran, a third world nothing, to keep the focus off China and Russia.
Recommendation 13: "There must be a renewed and sustained commitment by the United States to a comprehensive Arab-Israeli peace on all fronts: Lebanon and Syria, and President Bush's June 2002 commitment to a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine" Boy we haven't heard this one in the last 30 years. Land for Peace seems to be working almost as well as Oil-for-Food. Gotta love the UN.
Recommendation 19: "The President and the leadership of his national security team should remain in close and frequent contact with the Iraqi leadership..." Now that is thinking outside the box. The entire recommendation in context, or out of context assumes that this isn't happening now, and that the entire United States Government is to stupid to figure this out. How asinine is this ISG.
Recommendation 34: "Violence cannot end unless dialogue begins, and the dialogue must involve those who wield power, not simply those who hold political office. The Unites States must try to talk directly to Grand Ayatollah Sistani and must consider appointing a high-level American Shia Muslim to serve as an emissary to him. The United States must also try to talk directly to Moqtada al-Sadr, to militia leaders, and to insurgent leaders. The United Nations can help facilitate contacts." There is that UN suggestion again, and they recommend talking to the very people in Iraq giving the orders to kill innocent civilians and the brave members of the American Military. The fox is in the hen house, and we are going to talk to him as he eats the chickens.
These recommendations were the meat of the answer to the violence in Iraq. Basically talk to Iran, Syria, and their agents within the borders of Iraq, because Iran, Syria, and Lebanon have a vested interest in a stable Iraq. This report is a pipe dream, based on an idealistic view of the same generation that gave us Viet Nam. The truth is that this region and the world are horrified of a stable, democratic, capitalistic, Iraq supported by the United States and other democratic nations. A stable Iraq would only strengthen the United States position in the World, and create a power shift in the middle east rendering Syria and Iran obsolete politically and economically. The President should read this, take it into consideration, and then use it to line the birdcage. Then call Iran, Syria, al-Sadr, and Sistani, and give them the ultimatums, not our allies.
I would like to start with the Iraq Study Group members. These individuals represent the best in American education and experience in political and social sciences. Every single one of them have very impressive resumes. They each have spent their entire careers in some sort of highly regarded council or committee. They are the best of the best of American Bureaucracy. Two questions though Sandra Day O'Connor and Vernon Jordan.....Hey look at that I am bipartisan.
What the hell do they have to do with anything in Iraq.
Vernon Jordan - Stain Master General himself. Apparently covering up presidential perjury, sex scandals, and shady real estate deals constitutes foreign policy experience. Despite his apparently stellar resume stated in the ISG report, there had to be more credible candidate than this guy.
Sandra Day O'Connor - I guess she was selected for her experience with constitutional law. I am assuming she knows how to build a Constitution considering she has spent most of her tenor as Supreme Court Justice deconstructing ours.
With this groups obvious experience and education the ISG report should be a grand document full of ideas that are "outside of the box", and according to the media this group will have the answers to all our problems with the war on terror. When the report was finally released the individual members obviously felt like they were really really really really really really important. The arrogance and condescension with which the members of the ISG carried themselves was almost as aggravating as listening to idle threats from 5' tall dictators of third world nations. If these guys and gal were so smart, educated, and experienced then why is the ISG report so incredibly stupid. I am not only talking about the entire concept in general, but individual statements are just laced with stupidity.
Just an analysis of a few "Recommendations" to prove my point.
Recommendation 3: The Iraq International Support Group
A conglomeration of Iraq's neighbors with a vested interest in a stable Iraq.
Actual statement in the ISG "It is clear to Iraq Study Group members that all of Iraq's neighbors are anxious about the situation in Iraq. (ya think?) They favor a unified Iraq that is strong enough to maintain its territorial integrity, but not so powerful as to threaten its neighbors. None favors a break up of the Iraqi state."
Uhhh what? Isn't there a consensus that Iran and Syria are the major contributors to the chaos, thus supporting a more chaotic Iraq? Just a question. The report continues to reinforce the idea that Iran and Syria want a stable Iraq with multiple examples of Iran and Syria promoting the violence in Iraq. This includes statements saying that Iran is training, supplying, and funding shia groups. Sure does sound like an interest in a stable Iraq.
Recommendation 4: Iraq Support Group - More of the same. Appease the terrorists. Negotiate with Iran Syria and Palestine.
"Accordingly, the Support Group should actively engage Iran and Syria in its diplomatic dialogue, without preconditions" - There is some wisdom. So, the United States can offer ultimatums to the Iraqis, but not our enemies.
Recommendation 9: "...United States should engage directly with Iran and Syria in order to try to obtain their commitment to constructive policies toward Iraq and other regional issues." Then they go on to quote a "senior military official" in Iraq as saying "Iran does its negotiating with the United States on the streets of Baghdad". There is less contradiction in the Koran.
Recommendation 10: "The issue of Iran's nuclear programs should continue to be dealt with by the United Nations Security Council and its five permanent members (i.e. United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia, and China) plus Germany." The UN? Come on they can't be serious. I mean the UN and the security council, have a stellar record in the Middle East. Ask any Jew living in Israel. I feel that China and Russia want us to focus on Iran, a third world nothing, to keep the focus off China and Russia.
Recommendation 13: "There must be a renewed and sustained commitment by the United States to a comprehensive Arab-Israeli peace on all fronts: Lebanon and Syria, and President Bush's June 2002 commitment to a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine" Boy we haven't heard this one in the last 30 years. Land for Peace seems to be working almost as well as Oil-for-Food. Gotta love the UN.
Recommendation 19: "The President and the leadership of his national security team should remain in close and frequent contact with the Iraqi leadership..." Now that is thinking outside the box. The entire recommendation in context, or out of context assumes that this isn't happening now, and that the entire United States Government is to stupid to figure this out. How asinine is this ISG.
Recommendation 34: "Violence cannot end unless dialogue begins, and the dialogue must involve those who wield power, not simply those who hold political office. The Unites States must try to talk directly to Grand Ayatollah Sistani and must consider appointing a high-level American Shia Muslim to serve as an emissary to him. The United States must also try to talk directly to Moqtada al-Sadr, to militia leaders, and to insurgent leaders. The United Nations can help facilitate contacts." There is that UN suggestion again, and they recommend talking to the very people in Iraq giving the orders to kill innocent civilians and the brave members of the American Military. The fox is in the hen house, and we are going to talk to him as he eats the chickens.
These recommendations were the meat of the answer to the violence in Iraq. Basically talk to Iran, Syria, and their agents within the borders of Iraq, because Iran, Syria, and Lebanon have a vested interest in a stable Iraq. This report is a pipe dream, based on an idealistic view of the same generation that gave us Viet Nam. The truth is that this region and the world are horrified of a stable, democratic, capitalistic, Iraq supported by the United States and other democratic nations. A stable Iraq would only strengthen the United States position in the World, and create a power shift in the middle east rendering Syria and Iran obsolete politically and economically. The President should read this, take it into consideration, and then use it to line the birdcage. Then call Iran, Syria, al-Sadr, and Sistani, and give them the ultimatums, not our allies.
Thursday, December 7, 2006
BLUE COLLAR INTRODUCTION
WARNING: Language and topics of disscussion will be of an adult nature. Be good little parents and read this before your children do. This "biggot raciest homophobe" accepts no responsibility for the corruption of children due to lazy ass parents. The opinions of this "biggot raceist homophobe" are the sole property of said "biggot raceist homophobe", and if agreed with should be distributed by others at the risk of also being labled "biggot raceist homophobes".
The Speaker of the Blue Collar is a wholly owned subsidiary of Eat Shit and Die You Elitist Commie Liberal, Incorparated.
"If opinions were assholes I could shit Greyhound Buses" - Lance Madden
I am just an everyday 28 year old man that woke up one day and decided that everything wasn't as it seems. I realized that some things in the news were as close to being news as Madonna was to getting her virginity back, the news was not always true, and the opinions of the majority of the news media did not have to be recited like a Ted Kennedy speech. I realized MTV may not be the best place to "rock the vote". I realized my 5th grade sex education class probably led to my 12th grade homeroom becoming a Maternity Ward. I realized that no matter how "cool" it was, finding an intern that swallows isn't priceless, especially after funding your campaign savings account with Chinese money used to buy American ICBM technology. I realized not everything was so great during the 90's, and as a teenager that grew up in the Utopia of the 90's this epiphany was a frightening experience. On top of that civilization ended the decade by spending the entire year of 1999 preventing the end of the world that could have been caused by a computer virus, and not global warming. Rediculous...? Maybe.
So, in the last 1.5 presidential terms I have bucked the main stream media. Instead of taking the word of the media, I take an issue and find the facts, with no spin...believe me this is more difficult than breeding Pandas. With these facts I would do something that most people my age did not do. I developed my own opinion, and my own thoughts. In recent years these opinions have grown faster than Lyle Alzado's brain tumor. I can no longer contain them. So I have decided to hop on the enormous bandwagon and start my own blog.
Although I am inspired by Rush Limbaugh and others in talk radio and the internet, I am not a talker, which is why I have decided to use this particular medium. Plus it saves paper, which saves trees, which prevents global warming, which could end the world and so I am saving the planet, just like Al Gore...
Back on track.
On the other hand, I am not Stephen King either. I don't have a staff of English teachers to proof read my writing, so spare the grammar corrections. I will strive to keep facts and statements within the context of their meaning, and then express my opinion. I can promise this: I will NOT be objective. I am a God fearing, free market, capatilist pig with my head and ass wired together cooking full tilt boogey for truth, justice, and the American Way. A neo-con some may say, a right wing wacko, a conservative. Yes, yes, and yes, depending on the issue.
What I will do is brew my opinion steeped in the unrelenting pursuit for the truth. I will admit when I am wrong, and most likely gloat when I am right. I will not promise a frequency to the news letter. I am assuming that as I get better at writing the more frequent the posts will be, but for now just an introduction will do. The next topic discussed will be inspired by the issue of the day. Until then...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)